Opinion: It turns out private trash haulers aren’t the answer for many San Diegans

A San Diego trash truck. (File photo courtesy of the city) The city of San Diego’s new trash removal fee has shed light on the Pandora’s Box of problems of private haulers, particularly for residents in units of four or more who are now seeking private hauling services. There were comments through public testimony earlier this year and on social media that the private hauler services were cheaper, and would be the best option, compared to city employees. The speakers pointed to charges for other cities from these private haulers, which are now comparable to the final approved charges by the city of San Diego. But in Chula Vista, there have now been two instances highlighting challenges related to cities forming contracts with private haulers. And now we are seeing the problems with private haulers unfairly exploiting residents they are serving in San Diego.I have heard of private haulers either outright refusing service, claiming no longer to have capacity to provide the service, or quoting rates nearly two and half times higher than the city’s newly approved fee. This is deeply alarming. This disparity undermines claims of private-provider cost efficiency and raises concerns about potential market manipulation affecting San Diegans. The city of San Diego charges $43.60 per month for weekly collection of three 95-gallon bins for trash, recycling and organics. In comparison, private companies reportedly charge approximately $110 per month for similar services at multi-family residential units. This drastic difference can’t be just a matter of supply and demand but could suggest a coordinated effort to capitalize on a captive market. With residents having no other recourse, these private haulers are seemingly taking advantage of the city’s recent policy change to impose predatory pricing. This situation requires investigation by the city of San Diego and potentially the state of California. The recent interruption of services and significant price increases by private haulers raise concerns regarding potential price gouging. Elected officials should respond promptly to protect residents from any unfair financial practices. It is imperative that city officials examine the business practices of these private haulers and, if evidence of price fixing or undue market advantage is found, take swift and decisive action. San Diegans deserve fair and accessible waste management, whether provided by the city or the private market, where they may be forced into financial distress.Ultimately, in order to ensure fairness and stability for San Diego residents, the city should seriously consider two potential solutions. Imposing a fine equivalent to the municipal trash service fee could dissuade private haulers from levying excessive charges and encourage continued city service for affected units. Additionally, pursuing a ballot measure in June 2026 to allow city collection for these multi-unit residences — just as is done for single-family homes — could create a more equitable and sustainable approach. By proactively exploring these options, city officials can better safeguard residents from unfair practices while promoting accessible and reliable waste management for all. Mat Kostrinsky is a community advocate and small business owner residing in Del Cerro. He serves on the boards of the Patrick Henry High School Foundation and San Diego City Employees Retirement Medical Trust.